Painful Eyes in Neurology Clinic: A Guide for Neurologists.

Eye pain is a common complaint among patients presenting to the neurology clinic. It can be related to neurologic diseases, but it can also be a localized eye condition. Such disorders can be misleading, as their benign appearance might mask more grave underlying conditions, potentially leading to misdiagnoses or delayed treatment. Clinicians should be aware of the specific neurologic or systemic disorders (eg, demyelinating diseases or vascular abnormalities) that might first manifest as eye pain. Formal ophthalmic consultation is recommended for patients presenting with eye pain as the predominant complaint especially when red flags for more serious pathology are present.

Coexistence of neuropathic corneal pain, corneal nerve abnormalities, depression, and low quality of life.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of life (QoL), mental health conditions and corneal morphology in neuropathic corneal pain (NCP) subjects without a significant ocular surface disease. METHODS: A composite questionnaire was administered to 228 consecutive subjects, assessing the pain intensity, duration, and quality using a modified version of the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) and Pain Detect (PD) questionnaires. Subjects diagnosed with possible central NCP and two sub-groups of patients diagnosed with peripheral ocular pain completed an additional battery of mental health questionnaires and were examined by In Vivo Confocal Microscopy (IVCM). RESULTS: Of the 76 subjects that reported chronic ocular pain (duration >1 month), 53 were classified with probable NCP. Nine subjects without signs that justify the pain and non-responding to topical anaesthesia, were considered affected by central NCP. In these patients, a significant negative correlation was found between the presence pain and the mental component of the QoL (R2 = 0.733), and a positive correlation between the severity of pain the presence post-traumatic stress disorder (R2 = 0.83) and depression (R2 = 0.93). Although neuromas and sprouting had higher frequency in the central NCP group compared the control groups, these differences was not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of ocular pain characteristics using multiple questionnaires and IVCM may help to recognize differences between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. An association between pain intensity and mental health condition may guide the therapeutical choices.

FL-41 Tint Reduces Activation of Neural Pathways of Photophobia in Patients with Chronic Ocular Pain.

PURPOSE: To assess the therapeutic effect of tinted lenses (FL-41) on photophobia and light-evoked brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in individuals with chronic ocular surface pain. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: 25 subjects from the Miami veterans affairs (VA) eye clinic were recruited based on the presence of chronic ocular pain, dry eye symptoms, and photophobia. Using a 3T MRI scanner, subjects underwent 2 fMRI scans using an event-related design based on light stimuli: one scan while wearing FL-41 lenses and one without. Unpleasantness ratings evoked by the light stimuli were collected after each scan. RESULTS: With FL-41 lenses, subjects reported decreased (n = 19), maintained (n = 2), or increased (n = 4) light-evoked unpleasantness ratings. Group analysis at baseline (no lens) revealed significant light evoked responses in bilateral primary somatosensory (S1), bilateral secondary somatosensory (S2), bilateral insula, bilateral frontal pole, visual, precuneus, paracingulate, and anterior cingulate cortices (ACC) as well as cerebellar vermis, bilateral cerebellar hemispheric lobule VI, and bilateral cerebellar crus I and II. With FL-41 lenses, light-evoked responses were significantly decreased in bilateral S1, bilateral S2, bilateral insular, right temporal pole, precuneus, ACC, and paracingulate cortices as well as bilateral cerebellar hemispheric lobule VI. CONCLUSION: FL-41 lenses modulated photophobia symptoms in some individuals with chronic ocular pain. In conjunction, FL-41 lenses decreased activation in cortical areas involved in processing affective and sensory-discriminative dimensions of pain. Further research into these relationships will advance the ability to provide precision therapy for individuals with ocular pain.

[Differential diagnostics of chronic eye pain from a neurological perspective-What can also lie behind it]. / Differenzialdiagnosen chronischer Augenschmerzen aus neurologischer Sicht ­ Was auch dahinterstecken kann.

Periorbital pain and pain in the eye may arise from nociceptive processes such as chronic ocular surface destruction and inflammation, from neuropathic processes or often from a combination of different mechanisms. An important differential diagnosis are primary headache disorders and other neurological diseases, for example of inflammatory origin, which trigger secondary pain. Chronic eye pain therefore requires interdisciplinary collaboration in the diagnostics and treatment.

[Chronic eye pain]. / Der chronische Augenschmerz.

Numerous conditions in the field of ophthalmology are associated with pain in or around the eye. Chronic pain associated with the eye is a common finding in the daily routine of ophthalmologists and can be associated with primary ocular or extraocular diseases as well as with other conditions. Appropriate diagnostic assessment and management of people with chronic pain requires an understanding of the condition based on the biopsychosocial model in which the interactions of biological/somatic, psychological and social factors are determining pain and suffering. Beyond the ophthalmological findings,  close interdisciplinary cooperation and assessment are required. Therefore, if eye pain is insufficiently responsive to treatment or if symptoms of chronic pain are evident, pain medicine expertise should be involved. The management of chronic ocular pain is based on interdisciplinary multimodal approaches, in addition to the ophthalmologist-specific approaches. These focus on self-efficacy, patient competence and acceptance of pain as central goals of treatment rather than pain relief. Patient information, education and the development of a suitable concept by the interdisciplinary team are essential therapeutic aspects in this context.

Evaluation of ocular neuropathic pain.

AIM: To identify and assess the quality of current validated questionnaires that could be used to evaluate ocular neuropathic pain and its associated aetiologies. METHODS: A literature search was performed on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library. Articles evaluating questionnaires for ocular neuropathic pain and its associated aetiologies were included. Data on psychometric properties, validity, and reliability of the questionnaires was extracted and analysed using a set of quality criteria. Clinical and demographical associations with ocular neuropathic pain were also reviewed. RESULTS: The search generated 1738 results with 61 publications meeting the inclusion criteria. The 61 publications covered 28 questionnaires including 3 ocular pain, 12 dry eye disease, 2 blepharitis, 2 refractive surgery, 3 contact lens wear, 3 Sjogren's Syndrome, and 3 that were non-disease-specific. Only 57 publications provided enough data on psychometric properties and validity of the questionnaire to be included for quality assessment. The Contact Lens Discomfort Index (CLDI) had the highest rated psychometric properties, whereas the English version of the Ocular Comfort Index (OCI) provided the most data on psychometric properties (9 out of 10 criteria). Most ocular pain and disease-specific questionnaires contained appropriate items to assess ocular pain in specific populations. However, non-disease-specific ophthalmic questionnaires demonstrated poor reliability and validity when evaluating ocular pain. CONCLUSION: Ocular pain questionnaires can potentially diagnose ocular neuropathic pain. Disease-specific questionnaires were limited to their target populations, and non-disease-specific ophthalmic questionnaires were unreliable. Further studies are required to determine the most appropriate questionnaire to evaluate ocular neuropathic pain.

Painful-blind eye: A forgotten palliative care.

Painful-blind eye (PBE) is a challenging and debilitating condition that greatly affects the quality of life of patients. Although PBE can result from a variety of etiologies, currently there is no guideline or consensus on how to approach therapeutically these patients, and most treatments are experience-based. We summarized the evidence from available studies to investigate the current state of PBE treatment strategies. This review revealed that the information available about therapeutic approaches in patients with PBE is insufficient and outdated, therefore, new experimental and larger studies are needed to reach an agreement about this condition.

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular pain assessment survey (OPAS-J).

This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS-J) to measure ocular pain and quality of life. A multi-institutional cross-sectional study was conducted on participants with and without ocular pain. The Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale served as the gold standard for measuring the intensity of ocular pain. Sixty-four participants who visited two clinics located in Japan between May 2019 and October 2019 were included in the study. The OPAS was translated and culturally adapted to Japanese. The internal consistency of the OPAS-J was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Twenty-four (37.5%) and 40 (62.5%) participants were classified as having ocular pain and no ocular pain, respectively. All dimensions of the OPAS-J had good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.870 for ocular pain intensity over the past 24 h and 0.874, 0.899, 0.874, 0.871, and 0.876 for ocular pain intensity over the past 2 weeks, non-ocular pain, interference with quality of life, aggravating factors, and associated factors, respectively. The OPAS-J is a reliable and responsive tool that can be used to quantify ocular pain intensity.

Role of in vivo confocal microscopy in dry eye disease and eye pain.

Dry eye disease is known to have a lot of variability in presentation with overlapping subtypes. Understanding the pathology of this condition will guide therapeutic options. In vivo confocal microscopy is a diagnostic and imaging modality that provides high magnification and high-resolution images of all layers of the cornea and ocular surface. Various structures in the cornea and their alterations due to dry eye have been imaged. The impact of the tear film instability, inflammation, and altered homeostasis on the corneal epithelium, nerves, keratocytes, and dendritic cells have been evaluated across different studies. In addition, key features of IVCM in patients with neuropathic pain have been highlighted in this paper.

Hyperacute optic neuritis in a patient with COVID-19 infection and vaccination: a case report.

BACKGROUND: As scientific knowledge continues to grow regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, several neuro-ophthalmological manifestations have emerged, including rare reports of optic neuritis. Optic neuritis is an inflammatory demyelinating condition of the optic nerve that typically presents as subacute, unilateral vision loss and pain on eye movement. Several cases of COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 vaccination related cases of optic neuritis have been reported. We present a case of hyperacute, unilateral optic neuritis after both recent COVID-19 infection and subsequent booster vaccination. CASE PRESENTATION: Within two hours after receiving her COVID-19 booster vaccination, a 58-year-old female began experiencing bilateral eye pain, worsened by eye movements. The patient had previously contracted a mild COVID-19 infection three weeks prior to receiving her booster vaccination, confirmed by a rapid antigen test. The pain persisted in her right eye for a week at which time she presented to an ophthalmology clinic. She denied any changes to her visual acuity. Neuroimaging revealed right optic nerve enhancement, and the patient was admitted to the hospital for a course of intravenous steroids, which quickly resolved her eye pain. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of COVID-19 related optic neuritis following both COVID-19 infection and vaccination. High clinical suspicion is needed to make the appropriate diagnosis, as cases of COVID-19 related optic neuritis may exhibit mild presentations, as was the case with our patient.

Ocular Pain after Refractive Surgery: Interim Analysis of Frequency and Risk Factors.

PURPOSE: To examine the frequency and risk factors for ocular pain after laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: Prospective study of individuals undergoing refractive surgery at 2 different centers. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred nine individuals undergoing refractive surgery: 87% LASIK and 13% PRK. METHODS: Participants rated ocular pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 before surgery and 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. A clinical examination focused on ocular surface health was performed 3 and 6 months after surgery. Persistent ocular pain was defined as an NRS score of 3 or more at both 3 and 6 months after surgery (patients), and this group was compared with individuals with NRS scores of < 3 at both time points (control participants). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Individuals with persistent ocular pain after refractive surgery. RESULTS: The 109 patients who underwent refractive surgery were followed up for 6 months after surgery. Mean age was 34 ± 8 years (range, 23-57 years); 62% self-identified as female, 81% as White, and 33% as Hispanic. Eight patients (7%) reported ocular pain (NRS score ≥ 3) before surgery, with the frequency of ocular pain increasing after surgery to 23% (n = 25) at 3 months and 24% (n = 26) at 6 months. Twelve patients (11%) reported an NRS score of 3 or more at both time points and constituted the persistent pain group. Factors that predicted persistent pain after surgery in a multivariable analysis were (1) ocular pain before surgery predicated persistent pain after surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.31), (2) symptom report of depression before surgery (Patient Health Questionnaire-9: OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = 0.01), (3) use of an oral antiallergy medication before surgery (OR, 13.6; 95% CI, 2.1-89.3; P = 0.007), and (4) pain intensity day 1 after surgery (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; P = 0.005). There were no significant associations between ocular surface signs of tear dysfunction and ocular pain, P > 0.05 for all ocular surface signs. Most individuals (> 90%) were completely or somewhat satisfied with their vision at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven percent of individuals reported persistent ocular pain after refractive surgery, with several preoperative and perioperative factors predicting pain after surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Novel Treatments for Chronic Ocular Surface Pain.

ABSTRACT: Several etiologies can contribute to ocular surface pain including nociceptive, peripheral neuropathic, and central neuropathic mechanisms. Clinical clues can help identify contributors to ocular surface pain in a patient. In individuals whose pain persists despite targeting nociceptive contributors, neuropathic mechanisms should be considered and addressed using oral, topical, and/or adjuvant agents.

Characterization of patients with ocular pain evaluated with ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: The cause of ocular pain in the quiet eye is challenging to diagnose. It is a common complaint in the ophthalmology clinic and there are no actual guidelines on the exams that should be ordered initially. We decided to characterize patients with eye pain and normal ophthalmological examination who underwent ocular ultrasound, their findings, and systemic work-up. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent ocular ultrasound due to ocular pain and no clinical findings on initial slit-lamp examination. We evaluated patient characteristics and analyzed systemic work-up results in contrast to ocular ultrasound findings. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients with normal slit-lamp examination and ocular pain were evaluated using ocular ultrasound at Clinica Barraquer. Most of the patients were women (88.7%), and 55% were older than 50 years. Nearly all of the patients had echographic findings, 87.7% of patients showed evidence of scleral scars, from which 66.5% had signs of activity, and 42.9% had thickened extraocular muscles. In general, most patients with ocular pain had normal results on systemic work-up, but the patients who did have positive results tended to have echographic findings. CONCLUSION: Posterior inflammation is present in most patients with ocular pain in a quiet eye, and echography is an optimal tool to identify this. There is a tendency towards abnormal autoimmune test results and echographic findings. This should be considered in the initial work-up of these patients, given the importance of early diagnosis and the threat of vision loss with severe inflammation.

Clinical Neuroimaging of Photophobia in Individuals With Chronic Ocular Surface Pain.

PURPOSE: To examine neural mechanisms underlying photophobia in individuals with chronic ocular surface pain by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional case/control analysis. METHODS: A total of 16 individuals from the Miami Veterans Affairs eye clinic underwent comprehensive ocular surface evaluations and were surveyed for ocular surface symptoms. Case patients included patients who reported chronic ocular surface pain symptoms and light sensitivity at least most of the time over 1 week. Controls included persons without chronic ocular surface pain who reported no or minimal light sensitivity. All patients viewed light stimuli during 2 fMRI scans, one before and one after topical anesthetic instillation, and rated their level of pain intensity to the stimulus at the end of each scan. Areas of brain activation in response to light stimuli presentation were correlated with pain responses and examined post- vs pre-anesthesia. RESULTS: Case patients (n = 8) reported higher pain intensity ratings than controls (n = 8) in response to light stimuli during fMRI. Case patient ratings correlated more with light-evoked activation in pain-related areas within the trigeminal brainstem, primary somatosensory cortex (S1), anterior mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC), and insula than in controls. Topical anesthesia led to varying responses in pain ratings among case patients as well as decreased light-evoked activation in S1 and aMCC. CONCLUSIONS: The trigeminal nociceptive system may contribute to photophobia in individuals with chronic ocular surface pain. We demonstrate modulation of cortical structures in this pathway with topically applied anesthetic to the eyes. Further understanding of modulatory interactions that govern ocular surface pain and photophobia is critical for developing effective, precision-based therapies.

Differentiating primary dry eye disease from ocular neuropathic pain: implications for symptom management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Eyecare practitioners' management of ocular surface disease is essential in managing increasing dry eye disease (DED) presentations including ocular neuropathic pain (ONP). Topical Proxymetacaine offers a simple, readily available and practical method of detecting ONP in practice and can be used to differentiate ONP from DED by eyecare practitioners, when accompanied with an anterior segment examination. BACKGROUND: Differentiating DED from ONP presents a significant opportunity to eyecare providers, allowing appropriate treatment choices for more adequate symptom control, greater patient satisfaction, and reduced emergent re-presentations. This study aims to differentiate patients presenting with DED symptoms into DED or ONP using a simple diagnostic tool, which can be used in practice to allocate appropriate treatment options for the patient's respective condition. A comparison of the prevalence of presentations of ONP presenting with DED symptoms in hospital ophthalmology settings and in optometric primary care settings will also be made. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of DED were opportunistically recruited as they presented to ophthalmology outpatient clinics and primary care optometric services. Patients were then categorised as DED, ONP, or mixed DED/ONP based on their subjective response 30 seconds post-Proxymetacaine Hydrochloride 2% instillation. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited, including 12 patients from ophthalmologic outpatient clinics and nine patients from primary care optometric services. Twelve patients were identified to have primary DED, while nine patients were identified to have ONP. 43% of patients presenting with DED symptoms had features of neuropathic pain in ophthalmologic outpatient presentations compared to 44% of patients in primary care optometric services. CONCLUSION: Categorising DED and ONP patients by their response to Proxymetacaine can be used as a simple diagnostic tool in guiding future patient management and can be indicative of their potential response to topical therapies. The use of topical Proxymetacaine and the resultant change in ocular pain score can facilitate selection of patients who may benefit from centrally acting neuropathic pain agents over topical ocular therapy.